NuclearSAFE trademark logoNuclearSAFETechnology Platform Company
NuclearSAFE + U.S. Department of Energy

DOE has the mission. NuclearSAFE brings new end-state options.

Patented technologies for difficult nuclear materials that remain expensive to store, process, transport or disposition—built to be tested against DOE-defined performance criteria.

Don't change the mission. Change the toolset. NuclearSAFE proposes bounded engineering studies, surrogate demonstrations and independent validation before any larger deployment decision.

Conceptual NuclearSAFE SuperLAT deep horizontal repository beneath surface spent-fuel storage
Conceptual engineering visualization. NuclearSAFE technologies remain subject to testing, site-specific analysis, regulatory review and authorization.
$8.18BDOE EM FY2027 budget request
>90%EM budget historically contracted to industry
95,000+ MTU.S. commercial spent fuel currently stored
56M galHistoric Hanford tank-waste inventory
1,936Hanford Cs/Sr capsules moving to interim dry storage
Mission fit

DOE is already asking for what NuclearSAFE was built to deliver.

Environmental Management is publicly emphasizing innovation, efficiency, lifecycle-cost reduction, science-based decisions and movement toward defined cleanup end states. NuclearSAFE's portfolio is designed around those same outcomes.

01

Reduce lifecycle burden

Move selected inventories from repeated handling and indefinite stewardship toward engineered disposition.

02

Use mature industry

Adapt proven drilling, remote operations, materials, automation, monitoring and well-control capability rather than inventing infrastructure from zero.

03

Buy evidence first

Define the requirement, run a bounded test, independently verify the data, then decide whether to scale.

04

Add options—not disruption

Complement successful DOE programs while targeting the remaining materials, costs and end-state gaps.

NuclearSAFE's proposition to DOE: do not accept a new technology because it is patented. Give it a defined problem, measurable success criteria and a controlled demonstration.
Where NuclearSAFE can help

Start with problems DOE already owns.

Each opportunity below can be separated into a modest first study or demonstration rather than requiring DOE to adopt an entire disposal architecture at once.

01 · SNF / HLW

Spent nuclear fuel: storage → disposal

Storage manages the inventory. Disposal resolves it.

CinGOT™ and SuperLAT® are intended to create a disposal-ready engineered waste form and a deep, retrievable geologic emplacement architecture.

First DOE step: full-scale non-radioactive CinGOT/SuperLAT emplacement-and-retrieval demonstration with independent witnessing.
02 · HANFORD SPECIALTY WASTE

Cesium / strontium capsules

Interim dry storage is not final disposition.

DOE is moving 1,936 highly radioactive capsules into long-term interim dry storage while the final disposition pathway remains to be determined.

First DOE step: terminal-disposition engineering study for specialized high-activity capsules using NuclearSAFE encapsulation and deep-geologic options.
03 · HANFORD TANK WASTE

Selected liquid and secondary streams

Treat what must be treated. Avoid unnecessary process where another compliant end state may exist.

SES and SuperSILO® offer a platform for evaluating selected stabilized liquid, slurry or secondary waste streams—subject to classification, chemistry, performance and regulatory requirements.

First DOE step: waste-stream screening + bench chemistry + geologic-disposition feasibility study.
04 · PERMANENT DISPOSAL

Beyond one mined-repository architecture

A geologic repository does not have to begin as a mine.

SuperLAT offers a modular deep-horizontal architecture that can be evaluated within the applicable federal statutory and regulatory framework. Historic repository work reinforces the importance of site-specific hydrology and geology.

First DOE step: DOE-sponsored surrogate wellbore demonstration + generic performance-assessment comparison.
05 · LLW

Repurpose disturbed land intelligently

Existing mined land can become engineered infrastructure.

NuclearSAFE's OPM concept evaluates suitable large open-pit or disturbed mine sites for engineered LLW disposal using geology, barriers, drainage, monitoring and closure—not simple dumping.

First DOE step: national screening study of candidate disturbed sites against LLW siting and performance requirements.
06 · URANIUM / DUF6

Conversion addresses chemistry. Disposition addresses inventory.

DOE is successfully converting DUF6; NuclearSAFE focuses on long-term end-state options.

Patented NuclearSAFE concepts can be evaluated for selected depleted-uranium oxide, uranium-bearing residuals and other difficult uranium materials with limited reuse value.

First DOE step: disposition pathway comparison after conversion, including cost, transport, geology and lifecycle stewardship.
07 · IN-SITU TREATMENT

Selected waste: treat it where it is

Less excavation. Less handling. Fewer interfaces.

NuclearSAFE's in-situ vitrification and shallow geologic concepts can be screened for waste types where immobilization in place could reduce handling and transportation.

First DOE step: controlled surrogate materials test + applicability matrix for candidate DOE waste streams.
08 · CROSS-AGENCY MATERIALS

Depleted-uranium munitions and specialized radioactive materials

Some inventories need purpose-built end states.

Deep engineered disposition may provide options for selected DU-bearing military materials and other difficult government-owned radioactive products.

First federal step: DOE/DoD technical scoping study defining ownership, classification, transport and disposal requirements.
09 · SITING / GOVERNANCE

Compact footprint + consent + federal authorization

Smaller facilities can widen the conversation.

Modular deep systems may create more siting choices for willing communities and sovereign Tribal Nations. NuclearSAFE views this as a governance opportunity—not a regulatory shortcut.

First DOE step: integrate compact deep-disposal concepts into consent-based siting and community-benefit scenario studies.
A practical DOE interaction model

Don't adopt it. Demonstrate it.

The most credible path is staged, measurable and reversible. DOE controls the mission requirement; NuclearSAFE supplies technology; independent organizations verify the evidence.

01 · DEFINE

DOE names the problem

Waste stream, site condition, performance requirement, constraints and success criteria.

02 · ENGINEER

NuclearSAFE scopes the solution

IP-protected architecture, interfaces, hazards, test plan, costs and measurable outputs.

03 · DEMONSTRATE

Use surrogate material first

Full-scale non-radioactive equipment and field operations wherever practical.

04 · VALIDATE

Independent review

DNV, national laboratory, OU WCTC, INTERA or equivalent specialists as appropriate.

05 · QUALIFY

Regulatory & QA pathway

DOE safety basis, nuclear QA, site-specific analysis, NRC/EPA interfaces where applicable.

06 · SCALE

Contract what works

Integrate with DOE primes, industrial contractors, labs and federal programs under evidence-based milestones.

Procurement-friendly first steps

Make the first buy small enough to say yes.

NuclearSAFE's technologies can be separated into bounded work packages that generate evidence before DOE commits to infrastructure.

Study

Waste-stream disposition assessment

Output: requirements, candidate NuclearSAFE pathway, gaps, cost/schedule comparison and go/no-go test plan.

Field demonstration

SuperLAT + surrogate CinGOT

Output: full-scale drilling, emplacement, positioning, retrieval, re-entry, contingency and closure data.

Independent validation

Technology qualification package

Output: predetermined acceptance criteria, third-party witnessing, raw data and independent findings.

Site intelligence

Geology / siting screening

Output: host formation, hydrology, geomechanics, infrastructure and siting suitability matrix.

Legacy waste

Hanford / SRS special-stream pilot

Output: bounded technical case for a selected material that remains costly or lacks a final end state.

Integration

DOE prime / lab partnership

Output: NuclearSAFE IP inserted into an existing DOE execution ecosystem rather than building a new one from scratch.

Potential engagement mechanisms may include DOE procurement, competitive funding, prime/subcontract teaming, national-laboratory CRADA or Strategic Partnership Project arrangements, and other authorized federal mechanisms appropriate to the work.

Industrial foundation

Nuclear qualification is the work ahead. Drilling is not the learning curve.

SuperLAT interfaces with one of the world's most mature engineering industries. Directional drilling, casing, cementing, automated pipe handling, well logging, pressure control, intervention, re-entry, sidetracking and permanent abandonment are everyday oilfield capabilities.

250,000+Estimated horizontal wells / past decade
~4.5B ftEstimated wellbore / past decade
RemoteHandling, monitoring and control
RedundantPlug, re-enter, sidetrack or redrill
NuclearSAFE knows what to ask—and what a technically acceptable answer should look like. The company's drilling-management experience is intended to reduce integration risk as nuclear-specific qualification proceeds.
NuclearSAFE horizontal drilling industrial proof graphic showing repeated deep horizontal well construction
Industrial operating precedent supports the drilling component. It does not substitute for nuclear safety analysis, qualification or licensing.
Hanford: the clearest proving ground for new options

DOE is already changing the playbook.

Hanford is simultaneously retrieving tank waste, operating vitrification, evaluating glass-plus-grout strategies, managing storage constraints and moving cesium/strontium capsules into interim dry storage. That is precisely the environment where additional bounded technology options should be tested.

56 million gallons / 177 tanksHistoric Hanford tank-waste inventory generated during plutonium production.
24 single-shell tanks retrievedAbout 3.5 million gallons removed as of August 2026; DOE continues to accelerate the mission.
Vitrification is operatingLow-activity waste vitrification began in October 2025; DOE is also advancing complementary grout strategies.
1,936 Cs/Sr capsulesMovement to interim dry storage began in 2026; DOE states final disposition remains to be determined.
NuclearSAFE opportunity #1Terminal-disposition study for specialized high-activity capsules.
NuclearSAFE opportunity #2Screen selected secondary or stabilized streams for alternate geologic disposition—without disturbing waste pathways that are already working.
Regulatory realism

Innovation without shortcuts.

The credibility of the NuclearSAFE approach depends on acknowledging what technology can change—and what only law, regulation and federal authorization can change.

What NuclearSAFE is proposing

  • Generate evidence against DOE-defined performance requirements.
  • Map technologies to waste-form, retrievability, worker-protection, performance-confirmation, site-characterization and closure requirements.
  • Use nuclear QA and independent validation as the program matures.
  • Integrate with existing DOE, national-laboratory and industrial execution systems.
  • Compare lifecycle cost, schedule, worker exposure, surface footprint and reversibility transparently.

What NuclearSAFE is not claiming

  • No DOE, NRC or EPA approval is implied.
  • No single NuclearSAFE technology is presented as appropriate for every waste stream.
  • No community or Tribal partnership bypasses federal regulation.
  • No new architecture overrides current statutory requirements.
  • No industrial precedent substitutes for nuclear qualification.
Technology has changed. DOE now has options that did not exist when many cleanup strategies were created.
DrillingDeep horizontal wells are routine industrial infrastructure.
AutomationRemote handling and digital control reduce human exposure.
MaterialsAdvanced engineered waste-form and barrier options continue to expand.
MonitoringSensors, digital twins and AI support performance confirmation and operations.
ModularityRepeatable well systems allow staged deployment and redundancy.
NuclearSAFEPatents + field knowledge + nuclear expertise + an integrated end-state focus.
Current DOE signals informing this page

Built around DOE's own mission language.

The links below are included so DOE personnel and external reviewers can verify the current federal context directly.

DOE Office of Environmental Management ↗

Mission, sites, waste management, science and innovation.

DOE FY2027 Budget in Brief ↗

FY2027 EM request: $8.18 billion.

EM Acquisition ↗

DOE notes that more than 90% of EM's annual budget is contracted to industry.

Hanford 24th Tank Retrieval ↗

August 2026 status and accelerated cleanup strategy.

Hanford Cs/Sr Capsule Dry Storage ↗

1,936 capsules; interim storage while final disposition remains undetermined.

DOE Spent Fuel Inventory ↗

More than 95,000 metric tons at 79 sites; continued growth expected.

Savannah River Liquid Waste Plan ↗

Current SRS tank-waste planning and 2037–2041 completion scenarios.

DOE DUF6 Conversion Program ↗

Conversion to stable uranium oxide for reuse, storage or disposal.

DOE Consent-Based Siting ↗

Federal process for potential consolidated interim spent-fuel storage.

NuclearSAFE is an independent private technology company. Nothing on this concept page implies endorsement, sponsorship, approval or affiliation by the U.S. Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, EPA or any national laboratory. All NuclearSAFE concepts remain subject to testing, independent engineering validation, applicable procurement rules, site-specific analysis, environmental review, regulation and licensing/authorization.

A simple proposition

Give us the problem. Define success. Watch us demonstrate it.

NuclearSAFE's preferred starting point is a bounded DOE problem with measurable performance requirements—not a request to accept the entire platform on faith.

For DOE program, laboratory and contracting personnel

Discuss a waste stream, site condition, engineering study or surrogate demonstration that can be evaluated on evidence.

Start a DOE Technology Discussion